FOX’s James Rosen Asks the $64 Question About Comey’s EmailGate Decision

James Rosen James Comey Hillary Clinton

On Tuesday, FBI Director James Comey announced that Hillary Clinton is being let off scot free even though she put national security at risk, for the EmailGate scandal, a crime that would have put any other American in jail for up to ten years.

While James Comey admitted in his statement that any other American under similar circumstances wouldn’t be let off as Hillary was, FOX News reporter James Rosen shed light on one of the many inconsistencies in Comey’s statement.

The legal standard is “gross negligence,” but Comey, sounding more like Clinton’s defense lawyer, avoided using that incriminating term at all costs.

Instead, Comey used the term “extremely careless” to describe Clinton’s actions (emphasis added):

“Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.”

RELATED: VIDEO: Highlight Reel of Hillary’s Many Lies in EmailGate Cover-up

As Andrew McCarthy, himself a former Assistant U.S. Attorney, wrote in National Review today, James Comey (a longtime friend of his) rewrote federal law in order to let Hillary Clinton off the hook:

There is no way of getting around this: According to Director James Comey (disclosure: a former colleague and longtime friend of mine), Hillary Clinton checked every box required for a felony violation of Section 793(f) of the federal penal code (Title 18): With lawful access to highly classified information she acted with gross negligence in removing and causing it to be removed it from its proper place of custody, and she transmitted it and caused it to be transmitted to others not authorized to have it, in patent violation of her trust. Director Comey even conceded that former Secretary Clinton was “extremely careless” and strongly suggested that her recklessness very likely led to communications (her own and those she corresponded with) being intercepted by foreign intelligence services.

McCarthy goes on to properly point out that Comey inserted an “intent” provision in the law that is simply not there.

The formerly highly respected James Comey has lost all credibility. It’s a shame that he just flushed his entire career down the toilet with one corrupt decision, a decision which protects a corrupt politician not worthy of his favoritism.

About the Author

Matthew K. Burke
Matthew K. Burke
A former Washington State U.S. Congressional candidate in 2010, Matthew attended the nation’s first modern day Tea Party in 2009 in Seattle, Washington. He also began writing and blogging that year. Matthew became a Certified Financial Planner in 1995 and was a Financial Advisor for 24 years in his previous life. Matthew was one of the three main writers leading a conservative news site to be one of the top 15 conservative news sites in the U.S. in a matter of months. He brings to PolitiStick a vast amount of knowledge about economics as well as a passion and commitment to the vision that our Founding Fathers had for our Republic.
JOIN POLITISTICK
Subscribe for FREE today
to stay in the loop!

Send this to friend