The consequences of teaching a generation that “truth is relative” unfortunately has been morphed in the political realm into “truth is irrelevant.”
Unfortunately, this destructive societal meme has also become especially prevalent in media where “truth about the candidate we’re pumping not only doesn’t matter, but it doesn’t even exist.”
And while some “conservative” news and commentary websites have forever lost all credibility over their sycophantic hero worship of a lifelong liberal — a bloviating billionaire and reality TV actor with a serious case of untreated Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) — that bias is pale compared to the Democrat Media Complex’s cover-up over Hillary Clinton’s role in the death of four Americans in Benghazi, Libya, and then lying about it afterward, including lying to families of the fallen.
Hillary Clinton knowingly lied about the cause of the Islamic terrorist attacks in Benghazi on the evening of September 11, 2012, at every turn because Obama was just eight weeks before an election.
Corrupt Clinton’s expected response to this straight out of her husband’s 1990’s playbook — “Move on.”
Expectedly, Hillary’s water-carriers in the shameful and disgusting leftstream media are predictably creating the false narrative about the new Benghazi Committee report that there is “no evidence of wrongdoing” even though nothing could be further from the truth.
Others in the Democrat Media Complex are stealing another page out of the ’90’s Clinton Machine scandal response playbook. After denying, deflecting and more importantly, delaying investigations by throwing up every obstacle to obtaining the truth about their corruption, they push the narrative that the inevitable evidence of their dirty dealings is “old news” and therefore, no longer relevant.
Here they are circling the wagons for the scandal-plagued Hillary Clinton on Tuesday, just to give you a flavor of how the deception is being planted.
So, there you go. “Nothing to see here folks, move along,” the media might as well say. “Old news. Lying? Deceit? Cover-up for political power? Who cares? It was all the way back in 2012, four years ago!” is the message they are shouting from the rooftops.
The Clinton response to scandal can be summarized by four D’s:
- Deny the truth repeatedly — get media to repeat ad nauseum. Evidence be damned.
- Delay by not cooperating with investigations. “What difference at this point does it make?”
- Deflect (example: blame a YouTube video, or a “vast right-wing conspiracy”)
- Destroy the reputations of her or her husbands accusers (Nuts and Sluts campaign, reduce investigations to “right-wing conspiracy theorists,” continually call the investigation a “witch hunt.”)
Rinse and repeat. From Whitewater to Lewinsky, from EmailGate to Benghazi, the sleazy strategy is the same. And it works because the compliant media assists in the deception.
Kudos to FOX News (they have their own problems) reporter Catherine Herridge, who got it right: