Because now the First Amendment comes with a “Mr. Trump” exclusion — or something.
It doesn’t get any more ridiculous than this (but wait five minutes and it will). You just have to hope these Trump surrogates are well paid to constantly defend the indefensible because if he loses, there’s not going to be anyplace to go to get their reputations back.
Watch below as Trump sycophant Scottie Nell Hughes, devoid of sentence completion, tries to make the case that just because the Khans lost a son fighting for our country, it doesn’t give them the right to criticize her orange god-calf, Donald Trump.
The whole statement is one big incoherent word salad — as always — but this one point she made is utterly outrageous and repulsive.
“Just because they lost their son they can’t criticize something that has nothing to do with the loss of their son,” Hughes bumbles and mumbles at about 2,000 words per minute.
What’s that saying about when you find yourself in a hole, stop digging?