Leading Trumpaloompa: Losing a Son Doesn’t Give Khans the Right to Criticize Mr. Trump

Donald Trump surrogate Scottie Nell Hughes

Because now the First Amendment comes with a “Mr. Trump” exclusion — or something.

It doesn’t get any more ridiculous than this (but wait five minutes and it will). You just have to hope these Trump surrogates are well paid to constantly defend the indefensible because if he loses, there’s not going to be anyplace to go to get their reputations back.

Watch below as Trump sycophant Scottie Nell Hughes, devoid of sentence completion, tries to make the case that just because the Khans lost a son fighting for our country, it doesn’t give them the right to criticize her orange god-calf, Donald Trump.

The whole statement is one big incoherent word salad — as always — but this one point she made is utterly outrageous and repulsive.

“Just because they lost their son they can’t criticize something that has nothing to do with the loss of their son,” Hughes bumbles and mumbles at about 2,000 words per minute.

What’s that saying about when you find yourself in a hole, stop digging?


About the Author

Matthew K. Burke
Matthew K. Burke
A former Washington State U.S. Congressional candidate in 2010, Matthew attended the nation’s first modern day Tea Party in 2009 in Seattle, Washington. He also began writing and blogging that year. Matthew became a Certified Financial Planner in 1995 and was a Financial Advisor for 24 years in his previous life. Matthew was one of the three main writers leading a conservative news site to be one of the top 15 conservative news sites in the U.S. in a matter of months. He brings to PolitiStick a vast amount of knowledge about economics as well as a passion and commitment to the vision that our Founding Fathers had for our Republic.

Send this to a friend