Leftist Dianne Feinstein Butthurt Gorsuch Won’t Twist Meaning of Words [VIDEO]

One of the dirty tricks preached progressive leftist Democrats and their friends in academia is the evil notion that the U.S. Constitution is a “living breathing document.”

It’s a scheme for leftists to amend the U.S. Constitution without having to bother getting support to amend the Supreme Law of the Land. We currently have 27 amendments to the Constitution because it can be changed — a provision America’s brilliant Founding Fathers established so that it could be amended.

But sleazy leftists like U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein don’t want to go through the amendment process. Instead, they like to have leftist judges change the meaning of the written word in order to advance their anti-American communist agenda against the people’s wishes.

For example, they don’t like that words like “shall not be infringed” in the Second Amendment still mean “shall not be infringed,” despite the tireless attempts of activists judges trying to redefine those powerfully clear words.

RELATED: Ted Cruz Pulls Democrats’ Pants Down on Opposition to Judge Gorsuch [VIDEO]

Case in point was Feinstein on Monday during the confirmation hearing for Supreme Court justice nominee Judge Neil Gorsuch, where she browbeat the esteemed judge for his “originalist” judicial philosophy, a philosophy that means the definition of words are fixed in nature and can’t be changed willy-nilly because of fluctuating human passions or whims of judges.

“This is personal, but I find this originalist judicial philosophy to be really troubling,” Feinstein barked on Monday. “I firmly believe the American Constitution is a living document intended to evolve as our country evolves,” she grunted.

Feinstein went on to embarrassingly shoot her argument down by pointing by arguing that schools would still be segregated and women would not be allowed to vote under an originalist view when in actuality, only activist judges could have read in the original Constitution about women not being allowed to vote by changing the meaning of words or making things up.

But leftists like to find things like the “right” for women to murder their babies in the Constitution as long as judges make a ruling, despite what the written words say.

Ironically, Feinstein further argued that Gorsuch would overturn Roe v. Wade, a horrific judicial decision that invented the right to murder babies in the Constitution, even though the Constitution says nothing about abortion.

Using Feinstein’s living breathing document nonsense, couldn’t Gorsuch just say that the Constitution forbids abortion? Maybe she’d like to retract her words.

About the Author

Matthew K. Burke
Matthew K. Burke
A former Washington State U.S. Congressional candidate in 2010, Matthew attended the nation’s first modern day Tea Party in 2009 in Seattle, Washington. He also began writing and blogging that year. Matthew became a Certified Financial Planner in 1995 and was a Financial Advisor for 24 years in his previous life. Matthew was one of the three main writers leading a conservative news site to be one of the top 15 conservative news sites in the U.S. in a matter of months. He brings to PolitiStick a vast amount of knowledge about economics as well as a passion and commitment to the vision that our Founding Fathers had for our Republic.

Send this to a friend