Losing on Iran: The Iranian Deal Explained in Detail

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]If you’re like me, you’ve had a hard time cutting-through the rhetoric surrounding the Iran nuke deal. The Obama Administration has defended their willingness to negotiate at all costs while, on the right, there are many who are justifiably skeptical. After all, President Obama hasn’t exactly wowed anyone with his foreign policy chops after having been outplayed by Russia, Syria, Cuba, China and countless other  nations headed by actual leaders who understand how to trample weak negotiators.[/vc_column_text][banner300 banner=”5517620b381df”][vc_column_text]Still, as the talking heads discuss what they think about the deal, a detailed listing of what we gain and what we lose has been lacking from the mainstream media.

Thankfully, Noah Pollak at The Weekly Standard has compiled a detailed cost-benefit balance sheet for the deal.

What we get:


–       Iran reduces by about half the number of centrifuges actively enriching uranium


–       Iran reduces its stockpile of enriched uranium from about five tons to 300 kilograms


–       Iran repurposes its heavy water reactor in Arak so it does not produce plutonium


–       An unspecified increase in inspections by the IAEA


What Iran gets:


Sanctions relief:


–       Almost every type of U.S., EU, and UN sanctions lifted


–       Repeal of six UN Security Council resolutions declaring the Iranian nuclear program illegal


–       Top IRGC and Quds Force terrorists removed from the sanctions list, including Qassem Suleimani, leader of Iran’s campaign against U.S. soldiers in Iraq, and Ahmad Vahidi, mastermind of the 1994 Jewish community center bombing in Argentina that killed 85 people


–       The removal from the sanctions list of approximately 800 people and legal entities, including 23 out of 24 Iranian banks


–       $100 to $150 billion to be unfrozen and given to Iran with no restrictions on its use to purchase arms and fund terrorism, including funding for Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Assad regime in Syria

Nuclear program:


–       Iran keeps every one of its nuclear centrifuges


–       Iran keeps its entire physical nuclear infrastructure, including the enrichment facilities at Fordow and Natanz and the nuclear reactor at Bushehr


–       Iran permitted to continue research and development on all of its advanced centrifuge designs, reducing nuclear breakout time at the end of the deal to weeks


–       Iran permitted to transition its allowed enrichment of uranium from older centrifuge designs to advanced designs


–       No “anywhere, anytime” inspections. Iran can delay inspection of any site for at least 24 days


–       No requirement that Iran fully disclose past nuclear weapons research and development (known as the PMD issue)


–       The P5+1 western powers pledge to collaborate with Iran on nuclear technology


–       Restrictions on enrichment – part of the “sunset” of the deal – are lifted after eight years


–       If Iran is thought to have violated the deal, in order to “snap back” sanctions a dispute resolution process must be undertaken that can last two and a half months, after which the matter can be referred to the UN Security Council. At the UNSC, the re-imposition of sanctions can be vetoed by Russia, which stands to earn billions of dollars from arms sales to a non-sanctioned Iran.


Concessions unrelated to nuclear program:  


–       Ballistic missile embargo lifted after eight years


–       Conventional arms embargo lifted after five years


–       Iran keeps U.S. hostages

[/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]Of course, any dignified world leader would have insisted from the very beginning an act of good faith was in order and demanded the release of American hostages. After all, nothing says “trust” like one party to the negotiations keeping American hostages.

It seems pretty clear that the U.S. made-out poorly on this deal- an outcome many of us, sadly, fully expected.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]


About the Author

Greg Campbell
Greg Campbell
An unapologetic patriot and conservative, Greg emerged within the blossoming Tea Party Movement as a political analyst dedicated to educating and advocating for the preservation of our constitutional principles and a free-market solution to problems birthed by economic liberalism. From authoring scathing commentaries to conducting interviews with some of the biggest names in politics today including party leaders, activists and conservative media personalities, Greg has worked to counter the left’s media narratives with truthful discussions of the biggest issues affecting Americans today. Greg’s primary area of focus is Second Amendment issues and the advancement of honest discussion concerning the constitutional right that protects all others. He lives in the Northwest with his wife, Heather, and enjoys writing, marksmanship and the outdoors.

Send this to a friend