Mike Rowe Addresses Obama’s Expanded Background Checks, and ‘Dear Leader’ Won’t Like It

Mike Rowe/Facebook

Mike Rowe, best known as star of the hit Discovery Channel series Dirty Jobs, is not one to stay silent on controversial or political issues. Rowe current runs the mikeroweWORKS Foundation, which he describes as a PR campaign designed to reinvigorate the skilled trades.

On Friday afternoon, Rowe addressed Obama’s planned expanded background checks via illegal executive actions, in which Obama goes around the Second Amendment and Congress to attack the gun rights of law-abiding Americans.

In his post, which was placed both on his Facebook page and mikeroweWORKS.com, Rowe began by referencing the talking points that the Obama regime sent to celebrities ahead of his State of the Union (SOTU) address. These talking points were to be used by these leftist celebrities to help push Obama’s agenda out on social media.

Hello Friends

I’ve just received a request from The White House! On behalf of The President, I’ve been asked to share some talking points directly with each one of you, regarding the need to expand background checks on those citizens who wish to purchase a gun!

Just kidding.

For some reason, I was not among those celebrities selected to assist The White House in this endeavor. I’ve since recovered from my initial disappointment, and identified three possible explanations for the oversight.

1. The White House did not ask for my assistance, because they do not believe I’m famous enough to persuade anyone of anything.

2. The White House did not ask for my assistance, because they do not believe I would tweet out someone else’s words and claim them as my own.

3. The White House did not ask for my assistance, because they do not believe I support background checks.

With respect to #1, The White House is correct. My powers of persuasion, like my celebrity, are limited.

Regarding #2, The White House is correct again. I would never post someone else’s talking points as if they were my own. My own particular brand of hubris requires me to use my own words, which is probably why everyone in my office has developed a permanent facial tick.

As for #3 though, The White House would be mistaken to assume that I oppose background checks on gun purchases. I do not. I’m just skeptical that expanding a broken system is the best way to keep guns away from bad guys and lunatics.

RELATED: Obama: Gun Control Executive Orders Are ‘Entirely Consistent’ With Constitution. Here’s Why That’s A LIE

Rowe then went on to talk about some of the problems with the current system, including improper reporting of felony convictions which has allowed convicted felons to pass background checks. He also takes a dig at celebrities for being pawns in Obama’s overreach with expanded background checks while they do not hold the government accountable for not implementing the current system and laws.

Currently, thousands of people deemed mentally incompetent by the courts are NOT registered in our National Check System. That’s insane, if you’ll pardon the irony, in part because it’s so easily correctible. Likewise, The ATF says that most states report less than 80% of their felony convictions to the national system. As a result, nearly 7 million convicted felons are not currently registered. Is it any surprise that nearly every mass killer in recent memory passed a background check?

Seems to me, our current system is only as good as the records in it, and right now, those records are laughably incomplete. But even more troubling are the tens of thousands of people who ARE in the system, that keep trying to buy guns illegally with absolutely no consequence.

Lying on your application to purchase a firearm is a federal offense, but very few are prosecuted for doing so. According to Politico, the Feds have prosecuted just 1.5% of all those individuals who have attempted to purchase a gun illegally. If my math is correct, that means 98.5% of people who are NOT allowed to own a gun, have not been prosecuted for trying to buy one.

Maybe it’s a manpower problem? Maybe it’s a resource problem? But whatever the reason, many thousands of individuals who try to purchase a gun illegally are allowed to keep on trying. Many eventually succeed, and then use that gun in the commission of a crime. This strikes me a serious problem. And yet, I’ve received no tweets from my favorite action heroes, asking me to support an effort to fix the system we have. Why is that?

RELATED: Useful Idiots: Celebrities Given Pre-Approved Anti-Gun Talking Points To Tweet During Obama’s SOTU

In the end, Rowe also says that while he is not a member of the NRA, he does not believe the buy into the accusation that the NRA is responsible for the violence of all criminals and lunatics. In addition, he gives a nod to Trump, reality TV star and GOP presidential candidate frontrunner, for using his own words when talking about his stance on issues and says that Obama should allow celebrities to do the same rather than give them talking points to push out in manipulation of the American people.

To be clear, I’m not a member of The NRA. Last time I joined a club it was The Boy Scouts, and that was a long time ago. But from what I can tell, the NRA is not the reason that so many criminals and lunatics are able to buy guns today. Nor do they appear to oppose the kind of overhaul that would give us a more effective check system. In fact, wasn’t it The NRA that demanded background checks back in the mid-nineties, the moment the technology was first made available?

Regardless, we now possess the technology to update and maintain an accurate data base of felons, lunatics, gang members, terrorists, B-list celebrities, and other unsavory types that we can all agree should never be allowed to own a weapon. We also possess the ability to identify and prosecute anyone who attempts to buy a gun illegally. But if we don’t have the resources or the commitment to administer and enforce the system we have, why in the world would we want to make it bigger?

‪#‎When‬ there’s a hole in your net, you don’t need a bigger net; you need a smaller hole.

#When your foundation is shaky, you don’t keep building on top of it, you knock it down and start over.

Should The White House ever find itself in need of a tweet in support of that approach, please help yourself to either of the above. But if our elected officials are going to rely on actors and comedians to advance their political agendas, let’s not limit them to 140 characters or a list of pre-approved talking points. Seriously, where’s the fun in that? In the name of authenticity, let’s encourage our celebrities to use their own words.

Hey – it seems to be working for Trump…


h/t Twitchy

About the Author

Jennifer Burke
Jennifer Burke
Jennifer is a Co-Founder of PolitiStick and the Editor-in-Chief. She is a graduate of Texas A&M University and a certified teacher with 12 years experience in the classroom. Jennifer attended what is credited for being the first modern-day Tea Party rally in the country in the Seattle area and from there emerged as a powerful speaker and writer within the movement. While still in Washington State, Jennifer was selected to be a member of the second graduating class of the Jennifer Dunn Leadership Institute (JDLI), a program which identified future conservative leaders. Jennifer worked as the National Outreach Director for one of the largest conservative groups in the country and served as Managing Editor and writer for what quickly grew to become one of the top 15 conservative sites in the country. She brings to Politistick a passion for the fight for freedom for current and future generations.

Send this to a friend