As Hillary Clinton’s surrogates and campaign attempt to spin the way she attacked the mistresses of her husband Bill as well as the women who accused him of rape, sexual assault, and other types of sexual misconduct as understandable because she is only human, she is under fire yet again for another type of attack meant to destroy someone who was a threat to her lifelong quest for wealth, power, and control. This time, however, the destruction, if carried out, would have resulted in the death of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange.
Wikileaks tweeted an article by True Pundit about Hillary’s open inquiry whether Assange could just be droned and the laughter that her question elicited from others in the State Department who were in the meeting.
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) October 3, 2016
Before anyone argues that this was just a quip by Clinton, making light of a serious situation by joking, keep this in mind. There was an email chain involving Hillary and some of her top aides about “nonlegal strategies” to deal with Wikileaks.
Immediately following the conclusion of the wild brainstorming session, one of Clinton’s top aides, State Department Director of Policy Planning Ann-Marie Slaughter, penned an email to Clinton, Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills, and aides Huma Abebin and Jacob Sullivan at 10:29 a.m. entitled “an SP memo on possible legal and nonlegal strategies re Wikileaks.”
“Nonlegal strategies.” How did that phrasing make it into an official State Department email subject line dealing with solving Wikileaks and Assange? Why would the secretary of state and her inner circle be discussing any “nonlegal strategies” for anything whatsoever? Against anyone? Shouldn’t all the strategies discussed by the country’s top diplomat be strictly legal only? And is the email a smoking gun to confirm Clinton was actually serious about pursuing an obvious “nonlegal strategy” proposal to allegedly assassinate Assange?
This is possibly going to hurt Hillary’s support among pacifist Bernie Sanders supporters and Code Pink-types.
Think about it. Hillary Clinton wanted to launch a drone strike against a whistleblower. And she wants to call others vindictive and dangerous?
h/t Red State