This Hillary Clinton LIE Exposed at the #BenghaziHearings Makes Her Utterly Unfit for Office

Hillary Clinton, spinning lies at the Benghazi Committee Hearing, October 22, 2015Hillary Clinton, spinning lies at the Benghazi Committee Hearing, October 22, 2015

Democrats and the scandalous Clinton machine went into full-fledged spin cycle mode on Thursday — as would be expected — in the aftermath of the testimony from Hillary Clinton at the Benghazi Hearing Committee on Capitol Hill.

The progressively Marxist party, desperate to prop-up corrupt liar Hillary Clinton, currently the Democrat Party frontrunner among a sorry list, a literal clown car of candidates, including an admitted anti-freedom socialist, worked hard to spin the narrative that there was nothing new that came from the investigation.

The second narrative, which must have made those watching spit out their milk, was Democrats worried about the $4.7 million the Benghazi Committee had spent on the investigation, which as Chuck Woolery pointed out is a fraction of what Americans have forked out to pay for Obama’s golf trips.

Freedom Caucus chairman Congressman Jim Jordan (R-OH) took exception to the partisan Democrat Party’s robotic talking points.  Rep. Jordan said that while Rep. Adam Schiff (Commie-CA) and other leftists on the committee said there was no new information discovered, Americans now have concrete proof that Hillary knew the infamous “YouTube video” excuse for the attacks was a blatant lie, and that Hillary knew it.

“Mr. [Adam] Schiff has said there’s been no new information, but I think the fact that we now know that Secretary Clinton talked to the Egyptian Prime Minister and said ‘We know it was not a film — it was a planned attack’ — I think that’s some new information,” Jordan told FOX News on Thursday.

Jordan hammered the cold, calculating Clinton on Thursday, revealing new information that Hillary Clinton knew the truth all along, that the so-called “inflammatory material posted on the Internet” played no role in the attacks, which were planned terrorist attacks, not the spontaneous uprising Clinton and the Obama Regime constructed and blamed on the video critical of Islam.

Congressman Jordan showed the Benghazi Committee email exchanges between Hillary Clinton, exposing the fact — within 24 hours of the attacks — that the attacks were terrorist attacks.

“We know the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film. It was a planned attack, not a protest,” Hillary wrote the Egyptian prime minister.

Yet only five days after the attacks that killed four Americans, Obama appatchik Susan Rice said on CBS’s “Face the Nation,” on September 16, 2012, “what our assessment is as of the present is in fact what–it began spontaneously in Benghazi as a reaction to what had transpired some hours earlier in Benghazi as a reaction to what had transpired some hours earlier in Cairo, where, of course, as you know, there was a violent protest outside of our embassy sparked by this hateful video.”

“But soon after that spontaneous protest began outside of our consulate in Benghazi, we be believe that it looks like extremist elements, individuals, joined in that effort with heavy weapons of the sort thatt are, unfortunately, readily now available in Libya post-revolution,” said Rice. “And that it spun from there into something much more violent,” she argued.

Jordan revealed that the emails Hillary Clinton wrote to family members was a story that completely contradicted what she, Obama and Rice were telling the public, the line that the “video” caused the attacks, trying to provide cover for the 2012 Obama presidential re-election campaign theme that “al-Qaeda was on the run,” and therefore, the regime couldn’t allow the event to be categorized as a “terrorist” occurrence, but only a random act of violence.

“I want to show you a few things here. You’re looking at an email you sent to your family. Here’s what you said. At 11 o’clock that night, approximately one hour after you told the American people it was a video, you say to your family, ‘Two officers were killed today in Benghazi by an al-Qaeda-like group.’ You tell the American people one thing, you tell your family an entirely different story.

Also, on the night of the attack, you had a call with the president of Libya. Here’s what you said to him: ‘Ansar al Sharia’s claiming responsibility….And finally, most significantly, the next day, within 24 hours, you had a conversation with the Egyptian prime minister. You told him this: ‘We know the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film. It was a planned attack, not a protest.’

Let me read that one more time. ‘We know’ — not we think, not it might be — ‘we know the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film. It was a planned attack, not a protest.’

State Department experts knew the truth; you knew the truth. That’s not what the American people got. And again, the American people want to know why. Why didn’t you tell the American people exactly what you told the Egyptian prime minister?”

Hillary Clinton is a confirmed serial liar. No wonder most of the country doesn’t trust her. Like her former boss Obama, she is incapable of telling the truth.

If she would stand on the graves of dead Americans and lie about their cause of death, imagine what else she’d lie about as the next president.

Regardless of party, any corrupt liar is unfit for any public office, including dog catcher. She makes her lying husband look like a principled truth-teller. Americans have got to stop electing known liars, regardless of party. Hillary Clinton is a liar — even when it’s a matter of life and death.


About the Author

Matthew K. Burke
Matthew K. Burke
A former Washington State U.S. Congressional candidate in 2010, Matthew attended the nation’s first modern day Tea Party in 2009 in Seattle, Washington. He also began writing and blogging that year. Matthew became a Certified Financial Planner in 1995 and was a Financial Advisor for 24 years in his previous life. Matthew was one of the three main writers leading a conservative news site to be one of the top 15 conservative news sites in the U.S. in a matter of months. He brings to PolitiStick a vast amount of knowledge about economics as well as a passion and commitment to the vision that our Founding Fathers had for our Republic.

Send this to friend